Jakub Moc wrote:

>>> I would also like to know why the council has to be involved since
>>> you've never sent an email to infra specifically asking the same thing
>>> first. Sure makes sense to me that you should ask the group involved
>>> with the work first instead of going to the top.
> 
> Because it's been broken for ages? Because I've asked the same on the
> bug I've referred to multiple times, as did quite a few other people,
> and the thing is still dead ~3 hours a day? (So uhm, the argument that
> infra doesn't know about is _really_ moot.) Because users complain over
> and over again? Because we are getting tons of duplicate bugs due to
> bugzilla being non-responsive? Because it's wasting hours of my time
> every day? Because if CVS was in the same state, you'd about have a
> revolution by now?

There's a difference between "do you know its broke?" and "how is the
progress going?". I understood your email as "how is the progress
going?" as such, I did not see any recent comment made on the bug, nor
an email sent to us asking how the progress was going. I know you view
this as "I don't see it fixed, so that's not progress", but if you don't
think the hard work of the GNi folks of setting up some nice hardware
for this as part of the progress, then I'm sorry.

Anyways, if you would like, I can send you an update to the bug every
week until it gets completed. My guess (sparing any huge hurdles), is
that we can have the new bugs up by the end of this month. That's
including setting up the software, and testing it to make sure that the
issues that's been occurring have been addressed.

Cheers-

-- 
Lance Albertson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Gentoo Infrastructure | Operations Manager

---
GPG Public Key:  <http://www.ramereth.net/lance.asc>
Key fingerprint: 0423 92F3 544A 1282 5AB1  4D07 416F A15D 27F4 B742

ramereth/irc.freenode.net

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Reply via email to