On Wednesday 21 June 2006 03:06, Donnie Berkholz wrote: > I never said you didn't. And there's no need to bring in completely > offtopic points here, we're trying to have a discussion about qt. I am talking about qt. Maybe I wasn't clear enough, I was thinking of KDE users, that are, casually, the main users of Qt-related stuff.
In this particular issue, KDE (3) users are the main part, they need poppler and other stuff built for Qt 3. There are still just a few packages that relies on Qt 4 right now. Still, I'm not for the idea of just putting qt to mean Qt 3 and discard Qt 4 until it's "the chosen one", not only for a compatibility reason with migration from older version, but also because we do have people using gentoo for KDE 4 development (I happen to know a few of them), and they need Qt 4 support. I want to save both of them, asking a little bit more work for the developers, as they usually know what to do, rather than for users, which might as well be half clueless. Did I explain this long enough, or should I demonstrate again that I don't say stuff just because I have a mail client and a GPG signature? -- Diego "Flameeyes" Pettenò - http://farragut.flameeyes.is-a-geek.org/ Gentoo/Alt lead, Gentoo/FreeBSD, Video, AMD64, Sound, PAM, KDE
pgpLqTDHv9L1n.pgp
Description: PGP signature
