On Saturday 10 June 2006 10:42, Ciaran McCreesh wrote: > On Sat, 10 Jun 2006 10:56:48 +0200 Patrick Lauer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > | > When someone contacts GWN to have > | > something corrected, it would be appreciated were the GWN staff to > | > at least deign to acknowledge receipt, even if for some reason they > | > choose not to honour the corrections or post a retraction (although > | > refusing to publish corrections is extremely insulting to those > | > wronged). > | > | The reason for that is that the GWN is mostly sent out by mail. This > | makes corrections a bit more difficult, but I think having a sane > | policy for that would be helpful. > > Publish a 'corrections' section in the next edition?
and fix the original -mike
pgpfL0MzqlxZ7.pgp
Description: PGP signature
