Stephen Bennett wrote: > On Wed, 14 Jun 2006 20:01:04 +0200 > Jakub Moc <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> This new terminology plain sucks. If you are sticking games into >> <herd> in metadata.xml, you are just confusing me and other people >> who are assigning bugs. > > It's not new. If it confuses you, perhaps you should learn the > terminology used in metadata before you try to assign bugs based upon > it.
Sure... so, perhaps you have some suggestion how I can read assign bugs otherwise than using the metadata.xml; perhaps I could learn to read minds of the developers who dump irrelevant stuff into metadata.xml and expect someone to know what they meant. Meanwhile, I can just tell you that quite a bunch of people will actually get pretty angry once you start to apply this new on not-so-new terminology on stuff placed under their herd/project/whatever and will be dumping stuff on them... Like, perl, apache or php for starters. Because, they will get the bugs assigned, and they won't like it. And, we yet lack another method of assigning bugs other than using metadata.xml for this. -- Best regards, Jakub Moc mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] GPG signature: http://subkeys.pgp.net:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0xCEBA3D9E Primary key fingerprint: D2D7 933C 9BA1 C95B 2C95 B30F 8717 D5FD CEBA 3D9E ... still no signature ;)
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
