On Wed, 17 May 2006 12:14:37 +0200 Paul de Vrieze <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: | On Wednesday 17 May 2006 02:42, Stephen Bennett wrote: | > paludis/packages: | > -*>=sys-apps/portage-2.0.51.22 | > *sys-apps/paludis | | Is there any reason that portage and paludis can not live together.
Sure they can. That's not what that profile says. | With the contents of this profile I see no reason whatsoever to | include it in the tree. Paludis itself could easilly maintain a | blocker on portage. The rest is so boilerplate that it has no added | benefit of having paludis use the normal profiles. Again, that's not what that profile says. You need to read up on how the packages file works. Basically, lines starting with a - are removed from the existing set. | If paludis does not aim at replacing portage I'm sorry, but the term "Portage replacement" has been banned by the Gentoo thought police. -- Ciaran McCreesh Mail : ciaran dot mccreesh at blueyonder.co.uk -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
