On Tue, Apr 04, 2006 at 12:30:29PM +0200, Jan Kundrát wrote: > Jon Portnoy wrote: > > On Tue, Apr 04, 2006 at 11:50:18AM +0200, Jan Kundrát wrote: > > > >>I feel really confused. Have you read the logs of the recent affair? > >>Devrel *hadn't* requested anything, infra made an action on their own > >>and *didn't* revert it even after being told by devrel that no action > >>was requested. > > > > > > And then there was much discussion and it was largely resolved > > between the two projects, so I don't see how it's relevant to what I > > said. > > Well, you said that "Well, quite frankly devrel has never fallen down on > the job quite so often & so hard before handling this particular > incident." - but imho they didn't in the recent case, either. >
I was referring to the current pattern devrel seems locked in to, starting with current policy (and some IMO internal mishandling of the situation, but in the past and nothing a flamefest should be started over for sure). The 'infra picks up pieces' issue really should be a last resort sort of deal. > Thanks for polite replies, btw. > And same to you ;) -- Jon Portnoy avenj/irc.freenode.net -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
