On Mon, 2006-04-03 at 17:38 -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote: > i dont see how anyone can be against this (unless you're a terrorist!),
For someone who's promoting 'ubuntu' like conduct, your choice of words is rather Patriot Act-ish. If this two-facedness reflects the intentions of people behind this semi-civilized means of minority-control, I'll pass on it. The wording of certain phrases in this 'code of conduct' is really dubious : specific enough to be used for any purpose and vague enough to hold none of those in control responsible. Take for example the 'Repeated disruptive behaviors..' paragraph. If you really want to make a serious attempt at a code of conduct, you keep it simple, you keep it clean. You let the community decide on contents and don't mix rules with punishments in one and the same document. If you guys really had understood the Ubuntu contract you would've never dropped this 'constitution' on -dev like this, especially not at this time (you know what I mean). - foser
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
