On Sunday 02 April 2006 04:48, Daniel Goller wrote: > exactly, what's the point of removing it so fast? give people a chance > to miss it, it does not matter if it's removed or masked only as far as > going "woah, what?" and if masked it is a matter of unmasking rather > than recommitting
We haven't had a single issue with the usual seven day period as far as I can remember, so please come up with a valid argument against it, instead assuming turning my argument would be one. > in short, if it's slowing down the process, why do you need it to be > quick in the first place? Getting the junk out of tree and mind as fast as possible is a value in itself. Carsten
pgpM3Qs9oescc.pgp
Description: PGP signature
