Sam James <s...@gentoo.org> writes:
> Michał Górny <mgo...@gentoo.org> writes:
> [...]
>>> + local arg
>>> + for arg in "$@" ; do
>>> + if [[ -d ${arg} ]] ; then
>>> + mapfile -t -d '' -O "${#files[@]}" files < <(find
>>> "${arg}" -type f -iname '*.a' -print0)
>>> + else
>>> + files+=( "${arg}" )
>>> + fi
>>> + done
>>
>> Why not just pass all arguments to find(1)? If you pass a file path to
>> it, it will just return that file, i.e.:
>>
>> mapfile -t -d '' files < <(find -H "${@}" -type f -iname '*.a' -print0)
>>
>> ('-H' to follow symbolic links if passed directly in "$@")
>
> Oh! Good point. Let me try that.
This breaks some of the tests because we do some direct testing on .o
files. But I can't think of why a package would do that besides
toolchain packages where special care will be needed anyway, so I'll
adjust the tests.
