>>>>> On Sat, 12 Oct 2024, Ulrich Mueller wrote: > IMHO this would abuse the package name for information that absolutely > doesn't belong there. It belongs in PV or SLOT.
> To me it seems that you try to work around a problem (greedy upgrade > behaviour) that should really be solved in the package manager. How about introducing something like PROPERTIES="separate-slot" instead, which would instruct the PM to treat the slot like a separate package? Ulrich
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
