El dom, 04-08-2024 a las 00:44 +0300, Mart Raudsepp escribió: > On Sat, 2024-08-03 at 16:04 +0200, Pacho Ramos wrote: > > Hello, > > > > The rationale is briefly explained at: > > https://bugs.gentoo.org/910363 > > > > As gdk-pixbuf upstream is not including support for new formats, > > people > > usually need to manually enable "gdk-pixbuf" USE for important libs > > such as libheif, libjxl, or libavif. > > > > At least for Gnome environments, I think that the USE could be > > globally > > enabled as gdk-pixbuf is used everywhere and the dependency will be > > installed anyway. > > > > Any issues with enabling it for gnome profiles? > > gdk-pixbuf modules are a bit of an attack surface, so I feel a bit > uneasy about enabling it by default globally. Per-package enabling > (package.use) feels a bit safer to me. > It's also not a global USE flag and is used with different meaning > (e.g. in swaybg, rxvt-unicode, w3m), though that might be more of an > argument for default enabling for all packages in gnome profiles, as > gdk-pixbuf is there anyways. > > > Mart
Yeah, because of what you state in the second paragraph I would also opt for enabling it globally in gnome profiles :-/
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
