noticed something that doesn't make any sense: Andrew Muraco wrote:
- the existing portage code would consider +arch as a subset of arch, the reason both keywords will exist is to maintain compatibility with older versions of portage which will not recognize this.
would make more sense as:
- portage should consider +arch as a subset of arch, however, the reason both keywords will exist is to maintain compatibility with older versions of portage, which will not recognize this new keyword.
Thanks, Andrew Muraco -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
