http://viewcvstest.gentoo.org/viewcvs.py/gentoo/xml/htdocs/proj/en/glep/glep-0001.html?rev=1.8&view=log meh, when it comes down to it... isn't this good enough of a change log?
On 12/13/05, Olivier Crete <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Tue, 2005-13-12 at 21:09 +0000, Ciaran McCreesh wrote: > > On Tue, 13 Dec 2005 15:53:45 -0500 Olivier Crete <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > wrote: > > | Why not just modify GlEP 1 ? > > > > Going back and retroactively modifying standards is icky, and it > > *still* doesn't address the issue of documenting why the change was > > made. > > And why not just adding a changelog to the glep explaining the changes? > I really don't like to idea of having to read 8 gleps to find out how to > write a glep ... and calling it glep 1.a is a good idea.. or 1.1 > > -- > Olivier Crête > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Gentoo Developer > > > -- > gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list > > -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
