On Wed, 2005-11-30 at 12:53 +0100, Paul de Vrieze wrote: > On Wednesday 30 November 2005 01:11, Chris Gianelloni wrote: > > On Tue, 2005-11-29 at 23:19 +0000, Stuart Herbert wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > > > On Thu, 2005-11-24 at 09:16 -0500, Chris Gianelloni wrote: > > > > I'd like to add the apache2 USE flag to 2006.0's profile. This > > > > would not resolve bug #95140, but would keep users from hitting it > > > > by default. With apache being such a popular package, having it > > > > fail from a default stage3 installation reflects poorly on us all. > > > > If I haven't heard any good objections by November 30th, I'll make > > > > the change. This will *not* be retroactive to any previous release > > > > profiles. > > > > > > I must be missing something. How is adding the apache2 USE flag the > > > right solution to this problem with users trying to install apache > > > v1? > > > > *sigh* > > > > "This would not resolve bug #95140, but would keep users from hitting > > it by default." > > Why not fix the bug by adding this line to the compile stage of apache: > 'CFLAGS="$CFLAGS -I/usr/include/gdbm"' > > This works and even without pulling in an extra dependency on db-1
Nothing I have suggested blocks actually fixing the bug. -- Chris Gianelloni Release Engineering - Strategic Lead x86 Architecture Team Games - Developer Gentoo Linux
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
