On Thu, 2005-11-24 at 20:57 +0900, Jason Stubbs wrote: > > Nope, not missing anything. Thought I said it, compability isn't a > > reason to hold this up anymore, only asking if people want multi-hashes > > now at the expense of a bigger tree when Manifest2 comes along. > > I'm referring to portage-2.0.50 and below. What exactly needs to be done by > those few that are still using it to upgrade to a better portage after it > dies on finding SHA1 sums in portage's digest?
They would need to redigest portage/sandbox with their version of portage, as you said. They would need to create a symlink from /etc/make.profile to /usr/portage/profiles/obsolete/$arch, then they would need to emerge --oneshot sandbox portage. After that, they can upgrade to a supported profile. -- Chris Gianelloni Release Engineering - Strategic Lead x86 Architecture Team Games - Developer Gentoo Linux
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
