-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Ned Ludd wrote: | On Sun, 2005-11-20 at 14:45 -0800, Donnie Berkholz wrote: |>Our policy for X is that if upstream won't accept it, we won't either. |>Perhaps you'd be interested in adopting that and convincing the reported |>to get upstream interested? | | | Your policy for X is somewhat questionable Donnie as it puts us in a | catch 22. You wont accept patches unless they came from upstream and | upstream wants some testing or to put it off till a later date..It's a | continuing heartache dealing with X when something could of been fixed | months ago.
Upstream CVS is the location for testing, not distros. Distributions should have a _more_ stable version of packages than unreleased CVS, not less. In addition, we're in the business of packaging source, not maintaining source. Taking on maintainance of all the source we package is unrealistic and is not why I do Gentoo. Thanks, Donnie -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFDgYelXVaO67S1rtsRAq6lAJ9aINu0FvPT9k+gYYXeRinsm6Ua/ACfb2bD yKSOWhYljy2aCMVOfz0aaRo= =nsW6 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
