On Sun, 2005-11-20 at 13:06 -0500, Chris Gianelloni wrote: > Huh? > > I was using it as an example of something that I would not be interested > in seeing in *my* tree since I wouldn't ever be able to attend. What > did you think I meant by it. Did I at any point say that the UK dev > meets are a bad thing?
I felt that you laboured the point beyond what was reasonable. It's a mis-understanding on my part, and I apologise. > > The events I've been involved in organising have been events for users, > > and they've always been put together by both developers and users. I > > believe that some of our users *are* interested in exactly this type of > > news - and, from the enquiries I've had in the past, not just UK-based > > people. > > Not in the tree. There is already a place for this stuff. Delivering news via this mechanism allows us to reach far more people than we can via the other places. If we could already reach everyone, we wouldn't need this mechanism in the first place. > It really sounds like you are wanting to make this proposal way too > complex, but I'll wait for the actual GLEP text before making any more > comments. I don't see the complexity here. We're proposing a capability to deliver news direct to our users, in a way that can be completely disabled or personalised. How many large corporations would kill to have something that could do that? ;-) If I can't convince you of the merits, I guess there's nothing else for it but to continue work on delivering the proposal without your support :( Best regards, Stu -- Stuart Herbert [EMAIL PROTECTED] Gentoo Developer
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
