Read the log before commenting. Along with the email containing the log It explains what occurred fairly well, oddly enough.
On 11/18/05, Corey Shields <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Friday 18 November 2005 08:31 pm, Lance Albertson wrote: > > No, thats not entirely true. It was submitted a few months ago and taken > > to the council where it was rejected and asked to be revised. When the > > council asked for things to put on their agenda for this latest meeting, > > it was asked that this GLEP be voted upon again. At this point, the > > revised version had yet to be shown on -dev for discussion. It wasn't > > until a day before the vote that it was sent to -dev for discussion. > > > > I just wanted to get the facts straight :-) (at least from how I know). > > Ahh, ok thanks for clearing that up. > > Still screwed up. Lesson learned, make friends with a majority of the > council, write and propose a glep the day before a meeting and then push it > through. wow. sounds a lot like American politics. > > -- > Corey Shields > Gentoo Linux Infrastructure Team > Gentoo Foundation Board of Trustees > http://www.gentoo.org/~cshields > -- > gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list > > -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
