On Tue, 2005-25-10 at 20:16 +0100, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
> On Tue, 25 Oct 2005 13:55:36 -0400 solar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> | Please do not put words in my mouth. I've already asserted to you
> | several times that the definition of RDEPEND= is unclear and that we
> | do infact need a new set of depend atoms. R=(runtime) not Buildtime
> | for the NNth time. Till then please focus your efforts on something
> | useful that does not break other peoples systems or projects.
> 
> Given the choice of possibly causing minor inconvenience to the embedded
> people or outright breaking the tree for every single user, the sane
> option is to keep the tree working. If embedded has a requirement for
> better DEPEND specifications, why don't they start working on a GLEP?

Maybe I dont get the problem of the embedded people, but why don't they
just rm -rf /usr/include (or INSTALL_MASK it)

-- 
Olivier CrĂȘte
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Gentoo Developer
x86 Security Liaison


-- 
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list

Reply via email to