On Wed, Sep 21, 2005 at 10:22:08AM -0400, Chris Gianelloni wrote: > I see absolutely no problem with that, so long as it is a warning. > > I mean, you can make it beep, pause, display in flashing red lights and > email [EMAIL PROTECTED] about it for all I care, but it shouldn't *die* on > something that isn't a requirement.
I think we all agree by now that we need a way to warn about missing CONFIG_ options in addition to the current implementation. Now we just need someone to implement it, and have the affected ebuilds changed accordingly. What about the other issue which was brought up? Ebuilds enheriting linux-info.eclass requires a configured kernel source? Personally, I don't see anything wrong with that, if the above solution is implemented (non-fatal checks remain non-fatal). Releng, cross-compilers - what are your thoughts on this? Regards, Brix -- Henrik Brix Andersen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Gentoo Metadistribution | Mobile computing herd
pgpatFNsfWHK5.pgp
Description: PGP signature
