On Monday 01 August 2005 10:22 am, Mike Frysinger wrote: > On Monday 01 August 2005 10:15 am, Chris Gianelloni wrote: > > On Sun, 2005-07-31 at 10:59 -0400, Ned Ludd wrote: > > > - x86/linux24 (deprecated) > > > - x86/linux26 (deprecated) > > > > What should we do with deprecated profiles? Should we still be checking > > against them? > > > > I would think we would, but what do the rest of you think? > > speaking of which, i had an idea to clean up all that crap, i just forgot > to post it a while back ... > > gentoo-x86/profiles/ $ tree obsolete > obsolete > <snip> > then we can punt all the flat profiles and if a user needs an upgrade path, > they can symlink to these in the meantime
well, no one has said anything about this so i'll go ahead and punt all remaining flat profiles and add this obsolete tree once 2005.1 is released in other words, these people will be served: default-alpha-1.4 default-alpha-2004.0 default-macos-10.3 default-macos-10.4 default-ppc default-ppc-1.0 default-ppc-1.4 default-ppc-2004.0 default-ppc-2004.1 default-ppc-2004.2 default-ppc-2004.3 default-ppc64-2004.2 default-ppc64-2004.3 default-sparc-1.4 default-sparc-2004.0 default-sparc64-1.4 default-sparc64-2004.0 default-x86-2004.2 default-x86-obsd-2004 gcc33-sparc64-1.4 hardened-x86-2004.0 -mike -mike -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
