So... why /etc/.skel/ needs to be touched by Gentoo emerges? Isn't
this directory subject to developers installing foo-bar.sh files?
So, isn't this case the same with /etc/profile.d ??
On 7/16/05, Marius Mauch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, 15 Jul 2005 21:34:09 -0400
> Mike Frysinger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > we could care less what users do with /etc/profile.d ... the point is
> > that *only* users should use /etc/profile.d ... we dont want random
> > Gentoo developer Foo installing some Bar.sh into /etc/profile.d with
> > package app-crap/FooBar
>
> Would the following in /et/profile be a solution to this problem?
>
> for x in $( < /etc/profile.d/.default); do
> source "/etc/profile.d/${x}"
> done
>
> That way devs could install stuff there, but it would only be run if
> users added it to the .default file.
>
> Marius
>
> --
> Public Key at http://www.genone.de/info/gpg-key.pub
>
> In the beginning, there was nothing. And God said, 'Let there be
> Light.' And there was still nothing, but you could see a bit better.
>
>
>
--
[email protected] mailing list
