On Tue, 2005-07-05 at 10:09 +0100, twofourtysix wrote: > On 05/07/05, Patrick Lauer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Tue, 2005-07-05 at 06:13 +0100, twofourtysix wrote: > > > Mostly, I was hoping that all those people who seem more than happy to > > > advocate something with *words* would be prepared to back them up with > > > *actions*. I think it's a shame that Gentoo is prepared to encourage > > > people to pester their politicians whilst simultaneously refusing to > > > spend a few minutes practising what it preaches. > > > > Ok ... let's remove all software that might violate a european patent. > > Who was talking about removing ebuilds for software just because that > software violates a patent? I certainly wasn't... Strange that I'm > being accused of trolling when I'm not the one with the straw man > arguments.
Strange that you still have not given your true identity after it being pointed out. Strange that some people cannot see that some of us just love working on Gentoo, and do not want it to become yet another Political debacle. Strange that the same people cannot fight their own battle, but need to do it under the cover of some group. Strange that the same people only wake up now. Strange that some people cannot realise that others might have a different point of view, and way of doing things. -- -core was humorous, but I really do not see why we need to start it all over again due to some nameless person that is too much of a coward to post as himself. Thanks. -- Martin Schlemmer Gentoo Linux Developer, Desktop/System Team Developer Cape Town, South Africa
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
