-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1
twofourtysix wrote: >> On 05/07/05, Robert Paskowitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> > >>>>You have encouraged gentoo to remove patent-encoumbered software from >>>>portage. I'd like to see you personally work with only software that >>>>does not contain any patented work. > >> >> >> No, I have encouraged Gentoo to remove software written by companies >> who are strongly behind software patents. Big difference. It's so easy >> to get software patents in the USA currently that it's likely that >> every single thing in the tree is covered by some bogus software >> patent. However, in most cases, these patents are not held by the same >> people who are making the software. >> The linux kernel includes selinux code (2.6 branch). Please see the following statement of assurance: http://www.securecomputing.com/pdf/Statement_of_Assurance.pdf . IBM and RedHat also have numerous patents covering the kernel. If IBM isn't a company strongly in favour of patents, I don't know who is. >> > >>>>>>I applaud Gentoo's >>>>>>efforts in displaying the banners, but so long as Gentoo continues to >>>>>>assist and advertise for the very companies who are pushing for >>>>>>software patents, I do not see it as a particularly credible protest. >>>>>>Would it not be better to avoid becoming involved in the issue >>>>>>entirely if one is not prepared to back up a cute little banner with >>>>>>actual actions? >>>>>> >> >>>> >>>>Gentoo has made no such efforts. Some developers have taken it upon >>>>themselves to make their feelings heard. For those that don't >>>>instinctively realise that planet.gentoo.org agregates stuff writen by >>>>individuals, the following notice is at the bottom of the page: >>>> >>>>Views expressed in the content shown above do not necessarily represent >>>>the views of Gentoo Linux or the Gentoo Foundation. > >> >> >> Oh come on. The planet is a service provided by Gentoo, with content >> provided by Gentoo developers, which is hosted on a Gentoo domain, >> presumably using Gentoo hardware. A cute disclaimer doesn't change its >> status. >> >> If you seriously think that content provided via the planet is not >> representative of Gentoo views, I invite you to try posting something >> really offensive to it and see how long it lasts. If it remains >> uncensored, I'll accept that Gentoo as an organisation has no >> influence over the content. Otherwise, by moderating the contents, >> Gentoo is implicitly accepting responsibility for the items which >> remain. >> Views on the planet of views of the developers. Plain and simple. So long as they relate in some way to gentoo, they are welcome. If they are not welcome there, they *are* welcome at universe.gentoo.org. It probably won't surprise you to know that that is hosted on the same machine as planet.gentoo.org. Of course, something flat-out inflammatory isn't likely to survive long, but that's related more to the Etiquette policy (http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/devrel/handbook/handbook.xml?part=3;chap=2), which _could_ probably do with another section regarding planet/universe(hint hint devrel). Furthermore, the idea of 'practising what you preach' would suggest that Gentoo not file patents over things it produces. It seems all too easy(and convinient) to blur the actual topic of discussion. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (Darwin) Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFCyi9GZwjIiODIZ4oRAljXAJwLxucVzSheSqqgqbynmVW6ketmxwCfQxIJ gdmwQXRhEptROqb9beDDWC0= =JRYR -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
