On Wed, 29 Jun 2005 14:37:42 +0200 "Diego 'Flameeyes' Pettenò" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wednesday 29 June 2005 10:02, Michele Noberasco wrote: > qingy seems to be just a replacement for getty so it isn't relative > directly with authorizations and authentication. > Same for kdm/gdm which are mere frontends and belongs better to their > own categories (as they can't belong to two of them). qingy handles directly tty binding (like getty), user authentication (graphically, via framebuffer) and session management (text console,gnome,kde)... Bye Michele -- If you think the system is working, ask someone who's waiting for a prompt.
pgpHJrAOUixJs.pgp
Description: PGP signature
