On Wed, 2005-06-15 at 10:34 -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote: > On Wednesday 15 June 2005 09:45 am, Chris Gianelloni wrote: > > On Tue, 2005-06-14 at 17:48 -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote: > > > On Tuesday 14 June 2005 05:32 pm, Paul de Vrieze wrote: > > > > I don't think gcc-config should depend on portage at all. Or does it > > > > actually use portage services. In any case it should be an RDEPEND, as > > > > building does not depend on portage being there. > > > > > > it was added when `portageq` didnt exist everywhere so we had to make > > > sure the portage on the system ran a new-enough version > > > > > > we can drop it now if it'll break this circular DEPEND > > > > Please do. > > notice the 'if it breaks the circle' ;) > > can someone confirm that ?
I just created a new snapshot with this change made, so I'll let you know. -- Chris Gianelloni Release Engineering - Strategic Lead/QA Manager Games - Developer Gentoo Linux
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
