Anthony Gorecki wrote:
On Monday, February 28, 2005 11:59 pm, Stuart Longland wrote:

...and some email clients (KMail comes to mind) are even able to
directly use this information.

Do we have any Mutt users that can comment on support for this?

Something tells me this is another one that supports this -- but I'm not sure.


(I'm tempted to do some maildrop/xfilter/perl magic to emulate these
features though)

Procmail rules are horrifying enough to be helpful as well :)

lol Don't remind me of procmail. I used to use it... the moment I heard about maildrop, I dropped procmail quick smart, and haven't looked back.

Procmail, while being a very good workhorse, the syntax of its files is
pathetic IMHO. (Just like another well-known mail package, Sendmail)  It
honestly looks like someone's beaten their head against the keyboard....
if you're not familiar with it -- it's enough for someone to want to
contribute in the same manner.

--
+-------------------------------------------------------------+
| Stuart Longland -oOo- http://stuartl.longlandclan.hopto.org |
| Atomic Linux Project     -oOo-    http://atomicl.berlios.de |
| - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - |
| I haven't lost my mind - it's backed up on a tape somewhere |
+-------------------------------------------------------------+

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature



Reply via email to