On Tue, 18 Jan 2005 13:20:59 +0100 Patrick Lauer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: | On Tue, 2005-01-18 at 13:11 +0000, Ciaran McCreesh wrote: | > On Tue, 18 Jan 2005 12:59:52 +0100 Patrick Lauer | > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: | > | No, a version bump of vim-plugin-1.2.eclass to | > | vim-plugin-1.3.eclass. So if you accidenally break something I can | > | revert to 1.2 withou doing weird cvs-fu and overlay hacks. | > | > Weird cvs-fu? Hardly... cvs log and cvs diff aren't exactly | > difficult. | For devs. | What about broken stuff on the user side of things?
They file a bug. | > No need to stick all sorts of weirdness into portage just because a | > few people are too lazy to read the cvs docs. Once you know how to | > use it, cvs is a lot simpler than trying to manually diff dozens of | > files. | Ok, but it still doesn't solve the problem of mutating eclasses. No, that one's solved by versionator. Really, I think you should put together a proper detailed list of what you think versioned eclasses would actually solve, so that I don't have to keep on discussing things with two different people who have very different ideas as to what the problem in question is... -- Ciaran McCreesh : Gentoo Developer (Vim, Fluxbox, shell tools) Mail : ciaranm at gentoo.org Web : http://dev.gentoo.org/~ciaranm
pgpfiYohzC2qZ.pgp
Description: PGP signature
