commit:     a393799453dbbafe309170ff399c80cbea9c9d35
Author:     Sam James <sam <AT> gentoo <DOT> org>
AuthorDate: Sun Oct  6 07:13:04 2024 +0000
Commit:     Sam James <sam <AT> gentoo <DOT> org>
CommitDate: Sun Oct  6 07:16:40 2024 +0000
URL:        https://gitweb.gentoo.org/repo/gentoo.git/commit/?id=a3937994

app-text/atril: depend on min mate-desktop matching ${PV}

Depend on >=mate-desktop-$(ver_cut 1-2) to avoid build failures for now
as a quick workaround.

The maintainers should check whether each package really needs it and
also consider a possible QA check in the eclass given some of them
seem to have a pattern in configure.ac for this, but given the bug has
been open for a whlie, I'd rather have some of the deps be unnecessarily
tight (not that it's even that tight) than as-it-was.

Note that couldn't use ${MATE_BRANCH} as it says:
> # Major and minor numbers of the version number, unless live.
> # If live ebuild, will be set to '9999'.
which made me wonder if it's actually meant to be 1-2 or 1-3 in ver_cut
or what.

Anyway, in summary:
* Apply a fix which makes things better, even if it's slightly overkill;
* Someone needs to audit these to find the actual minimum versions
  (some truly do need this, some need just something older, although
  unclear if upstream carefully update these or ont);
* A QA check may be wise.

Bug: https://bugs.gentoo.org/935279
Bug: https://bugs.gentoo.org/936079
Signed-off-by: Sam James <sam <AT> gentoo.org>

 app-text/atril/atril-1.28.0-r1.ebuild | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/app-text/atril/atril-1.28.0-r1.ebuild 
b/app-text/atril/atril-1.28.0-r1.ebuild
index 8f7cffc78013..1b915f2f6783 100644
--- a/app-text/atril/atril-1.28.0-r1.ebuild
+++ b/app-text/atril/atril-1.28.0-r1.ebuild
@@ -24,7 +24,7 @@ COMMON_DEPEND="
        app-text/poppler[cairo]
        dev-libs/glib:2
        dev-libs/libxml2:2
-       >=mate-base/mate-desktop-1.27.1
+       >=mate-base/mate-desktop-$(ver_cut 1-2)
        sys-libs/zlib
        x11-libs/gdk-pixbuf:2
        x11-libs/gtk+:3[introspection?]

Reply via email to