commit: 68c9b8f93ff895caa7bf5aaee085e66ffb7862a4 Author: Marek Szuba <marecki <AT> gentoo <DOT> org> AuthorDate: Wed Jan 31 12:48:34 2024 +0000 Commit: Marek Szuba <marecki <AT> gentoo <DOT> org> CommitDate: Wed Jan 31 12:55:22 2024 +0000 URL: https://gitweb.gentoo.org/repo/gentoo.git/commit/?id=68c9b8f9
app-crypt/chntpw: force -std=gnu90 Just a workaround for build errors for now. In the long run, I think I'd better look at whether how useful exactly (if at all) chntpw is against modern Windows versions, warrants all the changes required to make the code C99-compliant. Nb. It's gnu90 rather than c90 because of the use of // for comments. Closes: https://bugs.gentoo.org/919172 Signed-off-by: Marek Szuba <marecki <AT> gentoo.org> app-crypt/chntpw/chntpw-140201-r1.ebuild | 7 +++++-- 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/app-crypt/chntpw/chntpw-140201-r1.ebuild b/app-crypt/chntpw/chntpw-140201-r1.ebuild index 2aeae846a75b..8594fba742f8 100644 --- a/app-crypt/chntpw/chntpw-140201-r1.ebuild +++ b/app-crypt/chntpw/chntpw-140201-r1.ebuild @@ -1,9 +1,9 @@ -# Copyright 1999-2022 Gentoo Authors +# Copyright 1999-2024 Gentoo Authors # Distributed under the terms of the GNU General Public License v2 EAPI=8 -inherit toolchain-funcs +inherit flag-o-matic toolchain-funcs DESCRIPTION="Offline Windows NT Password & Registry Editor" HOMEPAGE="https://pogostick.net/~pnh/ntpasswd/"; @@ -34,6 +34,9 @@ src_prepare() { default sed -i -e '/-o/s:$(CC):$(CC) $(LDFLAGS):' Makefile || die + # MANY changes would be required for this code to be c99-compliant + append-flags -std=gnu90 + if ! use static ; then sed -i -e "/^all:/s/ \(chntpw\|reged\).static//g" Makefile || die fi
