commit:     00bfaba4292d55832f34e8377c612be31ccf58fe
Author:     Michael Mair-Keimberger <m.mairkeimberger <AT> gmail <DOT> com>
AuthorDate: Tue Jul 21 14:05:35 2020 +0000
Commit:     Kent Fredric <kentnl <AT> gentoo <DOT> org>
CommitDate: Tue Jul 21 23:16:59 2020 +0000
URL:        https://gitweb.gentoo.org/repo/gentoo.git/commit/?id=00bfaba4

dev-lang/perl: remove unused patch

Closes: https://github.com/gentoo/gentoo/pull/16762
Package-Manager: Portage-2.3.103, Repoman-2.3.23
Signed-off-by: Michael Mair-Keimberger <m.mairkeimberger <AT> gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Kent Fredric <kentnl <AT> gentoo.org>

 dev-lang/perl/files/perl-5.30.1-gcc-10.patch | 99 ----------------------------
 1 file changed, 99 deletions(-)

diff --git a/dev-lang/perl/files/perl-5.30.1-gcc-10.patch 
b/dev-lang/perl/files/perl-5.30.1-gcc-10.patch
deleted file mode 100644
index bb92527853f..00000000000
--- a/dev-lang/perl/files/perl-5.30.1-gcc-10.patch
+++ /dev/null
@@ -1,99 +0,0 @@
-https://bugs.gentoo.org/708744
-
-From 6bd6308fcea3541e505651bf8e8127a4a03d22cd Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
-From: =?UTF-8?q?Petr=20P=C3=ADsa=C5=99?= <[email protected]>
-Date: Tue, 12 Nov 2019 09:19:18 +0100
-Subject: [PATCH] Adapt Configure to GCC version 10
-
-I got a notice from Jeff Law <[email protected]>:
-
-    Your particular package fails its testsuite. This was ultimately
-    tracked down to a Configure problem. The perl configure script treated
-    gcc-10 as gcc-1 and turned on -fpcc-struct-return. This is an ABI
-    changing flag and caused Perl to not be able to interact properly with
-    the dbm libraries on the system leading to a segfault.
-
-His proposed patch corrected only this one instance of the version
-mismatch. Reading the Configure script revealed more issues. This
-patch fixes all of them I found.
-
-Please note I do not have GCC 10 available, I tested it by faking the version
-with:
-
---- a/Configure
-+++ b/Configure
-@@ -4701,7 +4701,7 @@ else
- fi
- $rm -f try try.*
- case "$gccversion" in
--1*) cpp=`./loc gcc-cpp $cpp $pth` ;;
-+1.*) cpp=`./loc gcc-cpp $cpp $pth` ;;
- esac
- case "$gccversion" in
- '') gccosandvers='' ;;
-@@ -4741,7 +4741,7 @@ esac
- # gcc 3.* complain about adding -Idirectories that they already know about,
- # so we will take those off from locincpth.
- case "$gccversion" in
--3*)
-+3.*)
-     echo "main(){}">try.c
-     for incdir in $locincpth; do
-        warn=`$cc $ccflags -I$incdir -c try.c 2>&1 | \
-@@ -5467,13 +5467,13 @@ fi
- case "$hint" in
- default|recommended)
-       case "$gccversion" in
--      1*) dflt="$dflt -fpcc-struct-return" ;;
-+      1.*) dflt="$dflt -fpcc-struct-return" ;;
-       esac
-       case "$optimize:$DEBUGGING" in
-       *-g*:old) dflt="$dflt -DDEBUGGING";;
-       esac
-       case "$gccversion" in
--      2*) if $test -d /etc/conf/kconfig.d &&
-+      2.*) if $test -d /etc/conf/kconfig.d &&
-                       $contains _POSIX_VERSION $usrinc/sys/unistd.h 
>/dev/null 2>&1
-               then
-                       # Interactive Systems (ISC) POSIX mode.
-@@ -5482,7 +5482,7 @@ default|recommended)
-               ;;
-       esac
-       case "$gccversion" in
--      1*) ;;
-+      1.*) ;;
-       2.[0-8]*) ;;
-       ?*)     set strict-aliasing -fno-strict-aliasing
-               eval $checkccflag
-@@ -5600,7 +5600,7 @@ case "$cppflags" in
-     ;;
- esac
- case "$gccversion" in
--1*) cppflags="$cppflags -D__GNUC__"
-+1.*) cppflags="$cppflags -D__GNUC__"
- esac
- case "$mips_type" in
- '');;
-@@ -23103,7 +23103,7 @@ fi
- 
- : add -D_FORTIFY_SOURCE if feasible and not already there
- case "$gccversion" in
--[456789].*)   case "$optimize$ccflags" in
-+[456789].*|[1-9][0-9]*)       case "$optimize$ccflags" in
-       *-O*)   case "$ccflags$cppsymbols" in
-               *_FORTIFY_SOURCE=*) # Don't add it again.
-                       echo "You seem to have -D_FORTIFY_SOURCE already, not 
adding it." >&4
---- a/cflags.SH
-+++ b/cflags.SH
-@@ -156,7 +156,7 @@ esac
- 
- case "$gccversion" in
- '') ;;
--[12]*) ;; # gcc versions 1 (gasp!) and 2 are not good for this.
-+[12].*) ;; # gcc versions 1 (gasp!) and 2 are not good for this.
- Intel*) ;; # # Is that you, Intel C++?
- #
- # NOTE 1: the -std=c89 without -pedantic is a bit pointless.
--- 
-2.25.0
-

Reply via email to