commit:     9b73e955e4c96dfe65752c7ddbd5385d928eef5d
Author:     Robin H. Johnson <robbat2 <AT> gentoo <DOT> org>
AuthorDate: Fri Apr 20 22:51:15 2018 +0000
Commit:     Ulrich Müller <ulm <AT> gentoo <DOT> org>
CommitDate: Sun Jun 10 18:42:07 2018 +0000
URL:        https://gitweb.gentoo.org/data/glep.git/commit/?id=9b73e955

glep-0076: Motivation: Improve readability re forked projects.

Signed-off-by: Robin H. Johnson <robbat2 <AT> gentoo.org>

 glep-0076.rst | 15 ++++++++-------
 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)

diff --git a/glep-0076.rst b/glep-0076.rst
index 31b8c35..7bb4893 100644
--- a/glep-0076.rst
+++ b/glep-0076.rst
@@ -35,13 +35,14 @@ time these formal agreements no longer were being signed, 
but the
 headers remained, and were enshrined in policy.  This led to a
 situation where copyright ownership might be ambiguous.
 
-Also, the general policy to have Gentoo Foundation copyright notices
-caused an issue when Gentoo developers forked another project and
-hosted the fork on Gentoo infrastructure.  To comply with the previous
-policy the copyright notices were modified, which caused concerns
-with the project the files were forked from.  Our previous policy
-completely neglected the possibility that Gentoo might want to host
-files that were not created internally.
+Also, the policy to have copyright notices ascribing copyright
+ownership to the Gentoo Foundation caused an issue when Gentoo
+developers forked another project and hosted the fork on Gentoo
+infrastructure.  To comply with the previous policy the copyright
+notices were modified, which caused concerns with the project the
+files were forked from.  Our previous policy completely neglected
+the possibility that Gentoo might want to host files that were not
+created internally.
 
 Finally, since the early days of Gentoo new ideas around copyright
 licensing have become more popular, such as the FSFE's Fiduciary

Reply via email to