commit:     6641085aa4aa83cd2a8cee848d028d792c9d9896
Author:     Michael Orlitzky <mjo <AT> gentoo <DOT> org>
AuthorDate: Sat Oct 31 01:15:43 2015 +0000
Commit:     Michael Orlitzky <mjo <AT> gentoo <DOT> org>
CommitDate: Sat Oct 31 02:21:44 2015 +0000
URL:        https://gitweb.gentoo.org/repo/gentoo.git/commit/?id=6641085a

dev-lang/php: add "any slot" operator to our dev-db/postgresql dependency.

This does not change the current behavior, and silences a repoman
warning. I also believe it is correct: dev-db/postgresql is slotted
along major (e.g. 9.3, 9.4) version lines. The libpq interface doesn't
seem to break between those versions, and mailing list discussions by
the Postgres devs indicate that they'd prefer to avoid that kind of
breakage.

Gentoo-Bug: 551526

Package-Manager: portage-2.2.20.1

 dev-lang/php/php-5.6.15.ebuild    | 2 +-
 dev-lang/php/php-7.0.0_rc5.ebuild | 2 +-
 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/dev-lang/php/php-5.6.15.ebuild b/dev-lang/php/php-5.6.15.ebuild
index 776f4f9..ae9e80d 100644
--- a/dev-lang/php/php-5.6.15.ebuild
+++ b/dev-lang/php/php-5.6.15.ebuild
@@ -116,7 +116,7 @@ DEPEND="
        nls? ( sys-devel/gettext )
        oci8-instant-client? ( dev-db/oracle-instantclient-basic )
        odbc? ( >=dev-db/unixODBC-1.8.13 )
-       postgres? ( dev-db/postgresql )
+       postgres? ( dev-db/postgresql:* )
        qdbm? ( dev-db/qdbm )
        readline? ( sys-libs/readline )
        recode? ( app-text/recode )

diff --git a/dev-lang/php/php-7.0.0_rc5.ebuild 
b/dev-lang/php/php-7.0.0_rc5.ebuild
index 5dd58ce..32c535f 100644
--- a/dev-lang/php/php-7.0.0_rc5.ebuild
+++ b/dev-lang/php/php-7.0.0_rc5.ebuild
@@ -111,7 +111,7 @@ DEPEND="
        nls? ( sys-devel/gettext )
        oci8-instant-client? ( dev-db/oracle-instantclient-basic )
        odbc? ( >=dev-db/unixODBC-1.8.13 )
-       postgres? ( dev-db/postgresql )
+       postgres? ( dev-db/postgresql:* )
        qdbm? ( dev-db/qdbm )
        readline? ( sys-libs/readline )
        recode? ( app-text/recode )

Reply via email to