commit: 7d4eab7ba0b4c04a9ac451e1e68210cab5d20c69 Author: Ionen Wolkens <ionen <AT> gentoo <DOT> org> AuthorDate: Wed Dec 31 02:27:37 2025 +0000 Commit: Ionen Wolkens <ionen <AT> gentoo <DOT> org> CommitDate: Wed Dec 31 02:37:04 2025 +0000 URL: https://gitweb.gentoo.org/repo/gentoo.git/commit/?id=7d4eab7b
x11-drivers/nvidia-drivers: add note to not stable 580.119.02 Been debating whether should really stable this for a while given keep seeing new regressions -- haven't kept links for each of them but the latest one I just seen made me feel like we better skip it. 590.xx is also affected by many of the same issues but was never going to stable NFB drivers either way. Nothing is broken to the point where I feel we need to mask though (unlike 580.105.08), for most anyway. ~testing users having notable issues may want to downgrade manually back to the stable version. Signed-off-by: Ionen Wolkens <ionen <AT> gentoo.org> x11-drivers/nvidia-drivers/nvidia-drivers-580.119.02.ebuild | 5 +++++ 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+) diff --git a/x11-drivers/nvidia-drivers/nvidia-drivers-580.119.02.ebuild b/x11-drivers/nvidia-drivers/nvidia-drivers-580.119.02.ebuild index f19f76f185ed..d32bb11ae401 100644 --- a/x11-drivers/nvidia-drivers/nvidia-drivers-580.119.02.ebuild +++ b/x11-drivers/nvidia-drivers/nvidia-drivers-580.119.02.ebuild @@ -3,6 +3,11 @@ EAPI=8 +# note: while this 580.119.02 version is not as broken as 580.105.08 +# was (no need to mask), it still seem to be affected by notable +# regressions compared to 580.95.05 and it should not be considered +# for stable (e.g. https://forums.developer.nvidia.com/t/355216) + MODULES_OPTIONAL_IUSE=+modules inherit desktop dot-a eapi9-pipestatus flag-o-matic linux-mod-r1 inherit readme.gentoo-r1 systemd toolchain-funcs unpacker user-info
