commit: 194f9c9c5d8ce6e161db1226a0ee8dc507836e93 Author: Sam James <sam <AT> gentoo <DOT> org> AuthorDate: Wed Oct 29 04:47:19 2025 +0000 Commit: Sam James <sam <AT> gentoo <DOT> org> CommitDate: Wed Oct 29 04:47:19 2025 +0000 URL: https://gitweb.gentoo.org/repo/gentoo.git/commit/?id=194f9c9c
profiles/base: mention /etc/portage/profile/package.use.mask in gnupg[verify-sig] mask This would've helped a user in #gentoo. Signed-off-by: Sam James <sam <AT> gentoo.org> profiles/base/package.use.mask | 3 ++- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/profiles/base/package.use.mask b/profiles/base/package.use.mask index 7b704e355222..badbee3618c1 100644 --- a/profiles/base/package.use.mask +++ b/profiles/base/package.use.mask @@ -10,7 +10,8 @@ # Help Portage resolve app-crypt/gnupg[verify-sig] with the app-alternatives/gpg # transition. The any-of dep in verify-sig.eclass helps a bit, but it struggles # after we made app-alternatives/gpg depend on newer gnupg to fix another problem. -# Users can unmask these locally once their upgrade is done. +# Users can unmask these locally in /etc/portage/profile/package.use.mask once +# their upgrade is done. app-crypt/gnupg verify-sig app-crypt/pinentry verify-sig dev-libs/libgcrypt verify-sig
