commit:     c4934edae0f83f1cee42d4890e01942ad17893f3
Author:     Sam James <sam <AT> gentoo <DOT> org>
AuthorDate: Mon Apr  7 06:54:23 2025 +0000
Commit:     Sam James <sam <AT> gentoo <DOT> org>
CommitDate: Mon Apr  7 06:54:46 2025 +0000
URL:        https://gitweb.gentoo.org/proj/gcc-patches.git/commit/?id=c4934eda

15.0.0: refresh tail patch

No functional changes.

Signed-off-by: Sam James <sam <AT> gentoo.org>

 15.0.0/gentoo/88_all_PR119614.patch | 161 +++++++++++++++++++++++++-----------
 15.0.0/gentoo/README.history        |   4 +
 2 files changed, 115 insertions(+), 50 deletions(-)

diff --git a/15.0.0/gentoo/88_all_PR119614.patch 
b/15.0.0/gentoo/88_all_PR119614.patch
index e577f8f..753002f 100644
--- a/15.0.0/gentoo/88_all_PR119614.patch
+++ b/15.0.0/gentoo/88_all_PR119614.patch
@@ -1,6 +1,49 @@
-https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119614#c12
+https://inbox.sourceware.org/gcc-patches/Z%2FNiBLuNG0iaDHwi@tucnak/
 
-2025-04-05  Jakub Jelinek  <[email protected]>
+From de8e860faaee40f7f34a66440e8f98ed97219a89 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
+Message-ID: 
<de8e860faaee40f7f34a66440e8f98ed97219a89.1744008820.git....@gentoo.org>
+From: Jakub Jelinek <[email protected]>
+Date: Mon, 7 Apr 2025 07:26:28 +0200
+Subject: [PATCH] tailc: Extend the IPA-VRP workaround [PR119614]
+
+Hi!
+
+The IPA-VRP workaround in the tailc/musttail passes was just comparing
+the singleton constant from a tail call candidate return with the ret_val.
+This unfortunately doesn't work in the following testcase, where we have
+  <bb 5> [local count: 152205050]:
+  baz (); [must tail call]
+  goto <bb 4>; [100.00%]
+
+  <bb 6> [local count: 762356696]:
+  _8 = foo ();
+
+  <bb 7> [local count: 1073741824]:
+  # _3 = PHI <0B(4), _8(6)>
+  return _3;
+and in the unreduced testcase even more PHIs before we reach the return
+stmt.
+
+Normally when the call has lhs, whenever we follow a (non-EH) successor
+edge, it calls propagate_through_phis and that walks the PHIs in the
+destination bb of the edge and when it sees a PHI whose argument matches
+that of the currently tracked value (ass_var), it updates ass_var to
+PHI result of that PHI.  I think it is theoretically dangerous that it
+picks the first one, perhaps there could be multiple PHIs, so perhaps safer
+would be walk backwards from the return value up to the call.
+
+Anyway, this PR is about the IPA-VRP workaround, there ass_var is NULL
+because the potential tail call has no lhs, but ret_var is not TREE_CONSTANT
+but SSA_NAME with PHI as SSA_NAME_DEF_STMT.  The following patch handles
+it by pushing the edges we've walked through when ass_var is NULL into a
+vector and if ret_var is SSA_NAME set to PHI result, it attempts to walk
+back from the ret_var through arguments of PHIs corresponding to the
+edges we've walked back until we reach a constant and compare that constant
+against the singleton value as well.
+
+Bootstrapped/regtested on x86_64-linux and i686-linux, ok for trunk?
+
+2025-04-07  Jakub Jelinek  <[email protected]>
 
        PR tree-optimization/119614
        * tree-tailcall.cc (find_tail_calls): Remember edges which have been
@@ -12,10 +55,65 @@ https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119614#c12
        * g++.dg/opt/pr119613.C: Change { c || c++11 } in obviously C++ only
        test to just c++11.
        * g++.dg/opt/pr119614.C: New test.
+---
+ gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/opt/pr119613.C |  2 +-
+ gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/opt/pr119614.C | 30 ++++++++++++++++++
+ gcc/tree-tailcall.cc                | 47 +++++++++++++++++++++++++----
+ 3 files changed, 72 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
+ create mode 100644 gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/opt/pr119614.C
 
---- a/gcc/tree-tailcall.cc     2025-04-04 20:52:34.450015821 +0200
-+++ b/gcc/tree-tailcall.cc     2025-04-05 14:50:50.106693562 +0200
-@@ -920,6 +920,7 @@ find_tail_calls (basic_block bb, struct
+diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/opt/pr119613.C 
b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/opt/pr119613.C
+index 432a30cdcdb0..2ced2e8fa2a0 100644
+--- a/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/opt/pr119613.C
++++ b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/opt/pr119613.C
+@@ -1,5 +1,5 @@
+ // PR middle-end/119613
+-// { dg-do compile { target { musttail && { c || c++11 } } } }
++// { dg-do compile { target { musttail && c++11 } } }
+ // { dg-options "-O0" }
+ 
+ struct S { S () {} };
+diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/opt/pr119614.C 
b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/opt/pr119614.C
+new file mode 100644
+index 000000000000..cb73fc3ec09d
+--- /dev/null
++++ b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/opt/pr119614.C
+@@ -0,0 +1,30 @@
++// PR tree-optimization/119614
++// { dg-do compile { target musttail } }
++// { dg-options "-O2" }
++
++struct S {} b;
++char *foo ();
++int e, g;
++void bar ();
++void corge (S);
++
++[[gnu::noinline]] char *
++baz ()
++{
++  bar ();
++  return 0;
++}
++
++const char *
++qux ()
++{
++  if (e)
++    {
++      S a = b;
++      corge (a);
++      if (g)
++        return 0;
++      [[gnu::musttail]] return baz ();
++    }
++  return foo ();
++}
+diff --git a/gcc/tree-tailcall.cc b/gcc/tree-tailcall.cc
+index c8740f9353e2..f51bb970e329 100644
+--- a/gcc/tree-tailcall.cc
++++ b/gcc/tree-tailcall.cc
+@@ -920,6 +920,7 @@ find_tail_calls (basic_block bb, struct tailcall **ret, 
bool only_musttail,
    auto_bitmap to_move_defs;
    auto_vec<gimple *> to_move_stmts;
    bool is_noreturn = gimple_call_noreturn_p (call);
@@ -23,7 +121,7 @@ https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119614#c12
  
    abb = bb;
    agsi = gsi;
-@@ -933,6 +934,8 @@ find_tail_calls (basic_block bb, struct
+@@ -933,6 +934,8 @@ find_tail_calls (basic_block bb, struct tailcall **ret, 
bool only_musttail,
        {
          edge e = single_non_eh_succ_edge (abb);
          ass_var = propagate_through_phis (ass_var, e);
@@ -32,7 +130,7 @@ https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119614#c12
          abb = e->dest;
          agsi = gsi_start_bb (abb);
        }
-@@ -1040,9 +1043,7 @@ find_tail_calls (basic_block bb, struct
+@@ -1040,9 +1043,7 @@ find_tail_calls (basic_block bb, struct tailcall **ret, 
bool only_musttail,
        /* If IPA-VRP proves called function always returns a singleton range,
         the return value is replaced by the only value in that range.
         For tail call purposes, pretend such replacement didn't happen.  */
@@ -43,7 +141,7 @@ https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119614#c12
        if (tree type = gimple_range_type (call))
          if (tree callee = gimple_call_fndecl (call))
            if ((INTEGRAL_TYPE_P (type)
-@@ -1052,9 +1053,43 @@ find_tail_calls (basic_block bb, struct
+@@ -1052,9 +1053,43 @@ find_tail_calls (basic_block bb, struct tailcall **ret, 
bool only_musttail,
                                              type)
                && useless_type_conversion_p (TREE_TYPE (ret_var), type)
                && ipa_return_value_range (val, callee)
@@ -90,45 +188,8 @@ https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119614#c12
        if (!ok)
        {
          maybe_error_musttail (call,
---- a/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/opt/pr119613.C      2025-04-04 20:51:42.482706589 
+0200
-+++ b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/opt/pr119613.C      2025-04-05 14:57:31.157353618 
+0200
-@@ -1,5 +1,5 @@
- // PR middle-end/119613
--// { dg-do compile { target { musttail && { c || c++11 } } } }
-+// { dg-do compile { target { musttail && c++11 } } }
- // { dg-options "-O0" }
- 
- struct S { S () {} };
---- a/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/opt/pr119614.C      2025-04-05 14:57:16.276551780 
+0200
-+++ b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/opt/pr119614.C      2025-04-05 14:56:46.020954674 
+0200
-@@ -0,0 +1,30 @@
-+// PR tree-optimization/119614
-+// { dg-do compile { target musttail } }
-+// { dg-options "-O2" }
-+
-+struct S {} b;
-+char *foo ();
-+int e, g;
-+void bar ();
-+void corge (S);
-+
-+[[gnu::noinline]] char *
-+baz ()
-+{
-+  bar ();
-+  return 0;
-+}
-+
-+const char *
-+qux ()
-+{
-+  if (e)
-+    {
-+      S a = b;
-+      corge (a);
-+      if (g)
-+        return 0;
-+      [[gnu::musttail]] return baz ();
-+    }
-+  return foo ();
-+}
+
+base-commit: 8fbe7d24373556d40886c7c00e9e2be5d9718c55
+-- 
+2.49.0
+

diff --git a/15.0.0/gentoo/README.history b/15.0.0/gentoo/README.history
index 7255415..20d64c4 100644
--- a/15.0.0/gentoo/README.history
+++ b/15.0.0/gentoo/README.history
@@ -1,3 +1,7 @@
+54     ????
+
+       U 88_all_PR119614.patch
+
 53     7 April 2025
 
        + 88_all_PR119614.patch

Reply via email to