On Thu, 10 May 2012 15:07:09 +0200 Benny Pedersen <m...@junc.org> wrote:
> > why not ext4 ?, imho ext4 is more caple of so big drives, specially on > fsck, my own qnap ts 419 p+ supports both so it must be good :=) > My plan for the drive is long-term and portable storage of digital files. The idea is basically write once, read many. Also, the drive has been formatted into several smaller partitions. For this kind of use I don't need the capabilities of ext4. In fact I don't even need a journal and could probably use ext2 just as well. Frank Peters
