Sami Näätänen <sn...@keijukammari.fi> posted
200905070157.35952.sn...@keijukammari.fi, excerpted below, on  Thu, 07 May
2009 01:57:35 +0300:

> The only thing that anoyingly invalidates my io buffers is listening
> music. Maybe I should cut the size of my Music library heavily. :)

Unless you're paying extra per-gig for inet, consider doing what I do 
much of the time, tune-in the icecast/shoutcast streams. =:^)

You can even streamripper them if desired, but of course there you go 
with the cache busting again. =:^(

> The real reason why I use tmpfs for the PM temp dir is not that it makes
> compiles so much faster, but the fact that it will also ease the
> unnecessary disk writes that building packages generate. This will
> result in a longer life time for my disks.

Well, if you spin-down your disks, possibly.  If you don't, they're 
spinning anyway (tho the seeking is additional wear-and-tear).

But depending on the I/O layout, keeping that extra data off the I/O bus 
can significantly improve system responsiveness, particularly for data 
that's not already in cache.  That's the biggest difference I noted, 
other than roughly halving my emerge times.

-- 
Duncan - List replies preferred.   No HTML msgs.
"Every nonfree program has a lord, a master --
and if you use the program, he is your master."  Richard Stallman


Reply via email to