On Sunday 03 May 2009, Duncan wrote:
> Dan Johansson <dan.johans...@dmj.nu> posted
> 200905031107.24458.dan.johans...@dmj.nu, excerpted below, on  Sun, 03 May
>
> 2009 11:07:17 +0200:
> > I noticed that emerge wanted to downgrade my
> > app-emulation/vmware-modules-1.0.0.15-r2
> >
> > # emerge --update --deep --verbose --reinstall changed-use world
> > --pretend
> >
> > These are the packages that would be merged, in order:
> >
> > Calculating dependencies... done!
> > [ebuild     U ] dev-perl/XML-Parser-2.36 [2.34-r1] 0 kB [?=>0] [ebuild
> >   UD] app-emulation/vmware-modules-1.0.0.15-r2 [1.0.0.23] 0 kB [0]
> >
> > Total: 2 packages (1 upgrade, 1 downgrade), Size of downloads: 0 kB
> >
> > I really don't get it
>
> It's likely that your current version has been masked, for some reason.
> Try this to find out why:
>
> emerge --pretend =app-emulation/vmware-modules-1.0.0.23
>
> That should tell you why it can't remerge that version, spitting out the
> comment from package.mask or otherwise telling you what's wrong
> (keywords, blocker, whatever).
>
> FWIW, it lets me pretend-install that version here, but I don't have
> VMWare installed (it's proprietaryware which I don't do) so whatever
> blocker there might be I'm not seeing, and if the mask was just added in
> the last 24-36 hours or so, I'd not see it either as I've not synced in
> that time.
No it's not the vmware-modules ebuild - it's not masked or keyworded.
# emerge --pretend =app-emulation/vmware-modules-1.0.0.23

These are the packages that would be merged, in order:

Calculating dependencies... done!
[ebuild   R   ] app-emulation/vmware-modules-1.0.0.23

I think it's a change in the vmware-server ebuild - without version change 
(:-(

# grep vmware-modules /usr/portage/app-emulation/vmware-server/*.ebuild
        ~app-emulation/vmware-modules-1.0.0.15
        !<app-emulation/vmware-modules-1.0.0.15
        !>=app-emulation/vmware-modules-1.0.0.16

The !>=...1.0.0.16 must be a new addition in the last one to two weeks. Before 
that this was not a problem.

If the devs think that 1.0.0.23 is a bad idea then OK I'll downgrade....
-- 
Dan Johansson, <http://www.dmj.nu>
***************************************************
This message is printed on 100% recycled electrons!
***************************************************

Attachment: smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature

Reply via email to