On Tue, 2009-04-28 at 13:42 -0300, Mansour Al Akeel wrote:
> OK, I think I narrowed down the cause a bit. I am getting this msg
> during hal installation, and before it fails:
>
> >>> /etc/conf.d/hald
> --- /sbin/
> >>> /sbin/umount.hal
> --- /lib/
> --- /lib/udev/
> >>> /lib/udev/hal_unmount
> --- /media/
> !!! copy
> /var/tmp/portage/sys-apps/hal-0.5.11-r8/image/media/.keep_sys-apps_hal-0
> -> /media/.keep_sys-apps_hal-0 failed
> .
> !!! [Errno 2] No such file or directory: '/media/.keep_sys-apps_hal-0#new'
>
> >>> Failed to install sys-apps/hal-0.5.11-r8, Log file:
>
> >>> '/var/tmp/portage/sys-apps/hal-0.5.11-r8/temp/build.log'
>
> * Messages for package sys-apps/hal-0.5.11-r8:
>
> * This package will overwrite one or more files that may belong to other
> * packages (see list below). You can use a command such as `portageq
> * owners / <filename>` to identify the installed package that owns a
> * file. If portageq reports that only one package owns a file then do
> * NOT file a bug report. A bug report is only useful if it identifies at
> * least two or more packages that are known to install the same file(s).
> * If a collision occurs and you can not explain where the file came from
> * then you should simply ignore the collision since there is not enough
> * information to determine if a real problem exists. Please do NOT file
> * a bug report at http://bugs.gentoo.org unless you report exactly which
> * two packages install the same file(s). Once again, please do NOT file
> * a bug report unless you have completely understood the above message.
> *
>
>
> Trying to create a file manually under /media is failing, even as a root
> I don't have permission to write to that folder! Which is really strange.
for comparison:
I get:oddman ~ # portageq owners / /usr/lib64/libhal.so.1.0.0
sys-apps/hal-0.5.11-r8
/usr/lib64/libhal.so.1.0.0
emerge hal works perfectly
I can create and delete files in /media.
I currently have a usb hard drive and a cd automounted in gnome, ls -l
shows
oddman ~ # ls -l /media
total 5
drwxr-xr-x 7 1032 users 2048 Jul 7 2008 Gentoo Linux 2008.0 amd64
LiveCD
drwxr-xr-x 5 root root 104 Apr 14 12:12 disk
drwxr-xr-x 3 root root 1024 Apr 14 12:19 disk-1
drwxr-xr-x 4 root root 1536 Dec 31 1969 disk-2
I have emerged dbus and hal and installed dbus and hald in the default
run level years ago.
I have evdev support in the kernel and in make.conf.
>
> $ ls -l /
> total 127196
> drwxr-xr-x 2 root root 4096 Apr 25 18:39 bin
> drwxr-xr-x 3 root root 4096 Apr 26 00:32 boot
> drwxr-xr-x 13 root root 14160 Apr 28 04:16 dev
> drwxr-xr-x 83 root root 4096 Apr 28 13:29 etc
> drwxr-xr-x 4 root root 4096 Apr 18 12:38 home
> lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 6 Dec 6 16:37 lib -> lib64/
> drwxr-xr-x 4 root root 4096 Dec 6 16:37 lib.backup
> drwxr-xr-x 10 root root 4096 Apr 25 18:44 lib64
> drwx------ 2 root root 4096 Nov 13 19:03 lost+found
> drwxr-xr-x 2 root root 0 Apr 28 04:15 media
> drwxr-xr-x 6 root root 0 Apr 28 13:36 mnt
> drwxr-xr-x 20 root root 4096 Apr 27 18:54 opt
> dr-xr-xr-x 108 root root 0 Apr 28 04:15 proc
> drwx------ 34 root root 4096 Apr 28 13:35 root
> drwxr-xr-x 2 root root 4096 Apr 28 13:32 sbin
> -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 130053783 Nov 13 16:44 stage3-amd64-2008.0.tar.bz2
> drwxr-xr-x 12 root root 0 Apr 28 04:15 sys
> drwxrwxrwt 6 root root 4096 Apr 28 13:40 tmp
> drwxr-xr-x 19 root root 4096 Apr 20 19:08 usr
> drwxr-xr-x 14 root root 4096 Dec 1 20:41 var
>
> I will keep on looking, in the mean while if anyone has an idea, please
> let me know.
>
> Thanks
>
>
> Drake Donahue wrote:
> > On Tue, 2009-04-28 at 12:52 -0300, Mansour Al Akeel wrote:
> >> I have been trying to install hal, but no luck. Everytime, I end up
> >> getting an error, and couldn't find enough information to resolve the
> >> issue:
> >>
> >> >>> Installing sys-apps/hal-0.5.11-r8
> >> * checking 171 files for package collisions
> >> * This package will overwrite one or more files that may belong to other
> >> * packages (see list below). You can use a command such as `portageq
> >> * owners / <filename>` to identify the installed package that owns a
> >> * file.
> >
> > What does running
> > portageq owners / /usr/lib64/libhal.so.1.0.0
> > tell you?
> >
> >> If portageq reports that only one package owns a file then do
> >> * NOT file a bug report. A bug report is only useful if it identifies at
> >> * least two or more packages that are known to install the same file(s).
> >> * If a collision occurs and you can not explain where the file came from
> >> * then you should simply ignore the collision since there is not enough
> >> * information to determine if a real problem exists. Please do NOT file
> >> * a bug report at http://bugs.gentoo.org unless you report exactly which
> >> * two packages install the same file(s). Once again, please do NOT file
> >> * a bug report unless you have completely understood the above message.
> >> *
> >> * Detected file collision(s):
> >> *
> >> * /usr/lib64/libhal.so.1.0.0
> >> * /usr/lib64/libhal.la
> >> * /usr/lib64/libhal.a
> >> * /usr/lib64/libhal-storage.so.1.0.0
> >> * /usr/lib64/libhal-storage.la
> >> * /usr/lib64/libhal-storage.a
> >> * /usr/lib64/hal/scripts/hal-luks-setup
> >> * /usr/lib64/hal/scripts/hal-luks-teardown
> >>
> >> .....
> >>
> >>
> >> * /usr/lib64/hal/scripts/linux/hal-system-wol-supported-linux
> >> *
> >> * Searching all installed packages for file collisions...
> >> *
> >> * Press Ctrl-C to Stop
> >> *
> >> * None of the installed packages claim the file(s).
> >> *
> >> * Package 'sys-apps/hal-0.5.11-r8' merged despite file collisions. If
> >> * necessary, refer to your elog messages for the whole content of the
> >> * above message.
> >>
> >>
> >> Hal is still not installed. It doesn't show under /var/db/pkg/sys-apps/
> >>
> >> Any one got in the same situation ?
> >>
> >>
> >
> >
>
