Everyone seems to like this. I see no reason for a formal vote. If people would be so kind to update or create confluence content, when we have a critical mass I can organize the switcheroo.
On Sat, Oct 16, 2010 at 7:45 AM, Colm O hEigeartaigh <[email protected]> wrote: > Another +1 from me. What about the webpages of the constituent > projects? For example, WSS4J has its own Forrest generated webpage. > Maybe this should be merged with the new WS confluence page as well? > > Colm. > > On Fri, Oct 15, 2010 at 8:25 PM, Andreas Veithen > <[email protected]> wrote: >> +1 for Confluence. >> >> I know more or less how the Confluence auto-export stuff works, but >> there are two technical questions that are not clear to me: >> >> 1. Where and how are the export templates maintained? >> 2. How is the exported content (https://cwiki.apache.org/WS) going to >> be published to http://ws.apache.org and how will we manage the fact >> that some subprojects continue to use generated (Maven) sites? >> >> Andreas >> >> On Fri, Oct 15, 2010 at 17:03, Daniel Kulp <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>> I'm definitely +1. Forrest sucks. :-) >>> >>> On Friday 15 October 2010 11:00:32 am Benson Margulies wrote: >>>> We've got 1.5 web sites here. >>>> >>>> There's >>>> >>>> http://ws.apache.org >>>> >>>> which is very stale, and 'maintained' using Apache Forrest, which >>>> isn't, well, maintained, and has no release that works with Java 1.6. >>>> >>>> Then we've got: >>>> >>>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/WS/Index >>>> >>>> which is more up to date, but needs to be exported (in place of the >>>> above) to be useful. >>> >>> Well, it's already being exported: >>> >>> https://cwiki.apache.org/WS >>> >>> but the template definitely needs a lot of work. As does the content. But >>> the content needs work in the forest site as well and I think editing the >>> Confluence content is much easier. >>> >>> Dan >>> >>> >>> >>>> I'll give this idea a day or two for discussion, and, barring giant >>>> problems, put it to a vote. >>> >>> -- >>> Daniel Kulp >>> [email protected] >>> http://dankulp.com/blog >>> >> >
