I am on vacation. expect a few remarks on xmlschema next week.
On Apr 16, 2010, at 10:28 AM, Glen Daniels <[email protected]>
wrote:
Hm, mostly crickets chirping.
Should we just Attic everything then? :)
--G
On Wed, 14 Apr 2010 23:08:17 -0400, Glen Daniels <[email protected]
>
wrote:
Hey y'all,
So as per my earlier mail to the dev lists, we need to talk about...
* Which subprojects should be promoted to TLPs?
* Which subprojects should be migrated to the Attic?
* What should the structure look like for what remains?
Here's what we've got to work with.
1. Axiom (commons)
2. Neethi (commons)
3. XmlSchema (commons)
4. Tcpmon (commons)
5. Guththila (commons)
6. JaxMe
7. jUDDI
8. Scout
9. Muse
10.Woden
11.WSIF
12.WSS4J
13.XMLRPC
Let's talk Attic first. It seems WSIF and Muse have been pretty much
inactive for some time now, so I'd propose we get the ball rolling
with
proposals to Attic both of those. JaxMe also seems ripe for the
Attic.
I think that it's pretty clear jUDDI and Scout should migrate
together
to a
new TLP, Apache jUDDI, with Kurt as chair. Thoughts?
Does anyone outside of Axis2/C use Guththila? If not, I'd suggest
that
migrate to Axis.
Is there enough activity on XMLRPC to keep it alive? Jochen?
Personally, I'd probably prefer to leave Axiom, Neethi, XmlSchema,
and
Tcpmon
as subprojects of WS. I'd like to get rid of the "commons" layer,
though,
since I think the "new" WS project should itself be a set of commonly
useful
WS components. I know other ideas have been discussed for the
commons
stuff,
so let's start that discussion and get the various opinions out on
the
table?
That leaves Woden and WSS4J. Maybe Woden should stay in WS? As for
WSS4J,
I'm not sure if it should stay or become a TLP.
So... what do you guys think?
Thanks,
--Glen
P.S. Reminder - please fill out your sections of our board report
for
this
month if appropriate!
