On Fri, Oct 31, 2008 at 9:21 AM, Samisa Abeysinghe
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> -1. They share the same architecture. They do the same this, only the
> implementation is different.
> And they are supposed to work with each other, interop in other words, so
> they have lot in common.
Interoperability is not an argument. Axis is trying hard to be
interoperable with others as well. About
the architecture: Might be, but that doesn't mean, that it is a single
community in practice.
To convince me, you should give me *more* examples like the following,
where work actually shared:
> It is a fact that, you can interop being disjoint projects. However, we even
> use the WSDL2Code tool to generate code. If Axis2/Java becomes a separate
> TLP and can an Axis2/C comittor do changed to that tool?
What's the problem? I can't see anyone from preventing an Axis2/C
committer being a
Axis2/Java committer as well, if he or she is interested in it? My
expectation would be,
though, that it is a minority only, who wants it.
Jochen
--
I have always wished for my computer to be as easy to use as my
telephone; my wish has come true because I can no longer figure out
how to use my telephone.
-- (Bjarne Stroustrup,
http://www.research.att.com/~bs/bs_faq.html#really-say-that
My guess: Nokia E50)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
