Anthony Elder wrote:
is Tuscany really a superset of WSIF? when i looked on it it had plenty of capabilities (component based assembly, covers service side and client side, extensive use of metadata/metamodel, etc.) and seems(?) to be several orders of magnitude more complicated than WSIF (scope of project, underlying requirement for SDO2, etc.) and aimed for different usage (for example it was not clear to me if you can add custom WSDL protocol binding providers such as in WSIF.) It seems a bit unfair to new users not to warn them that WSIF has likely passed its sell-by date.will Tuscany implement WSIF APIs or have something similiar already? can just WSIF-like capability be taken out of Tuscany and used in separation from other parts? thanks, alek
-- The best way to predict the future is to invent it - Alan Kay |
- Re: pruning projects @ ws Anne Thomas Manes
- Re: pruning projects @ ws Changshin Lee
- Re: pruning projects @ ws Srinath Perera
- Re: pruning projects @ ws Aleksander Slominski
- Re: pruning projects @ ws Nirmal Mukhi
- Re: pruning projects @ ws Sanjiva Weerawarana
- Re: pruning projects @ ws Aleksander Slominski
- Re: pruning projects @ ws Eran Chinthaka
- RE: pruning projects @ ws Granqvist, Hans
- Re: pruning projects @ ws Anthony Elder
- Re: pruning projects @ ws Aleksander Slominski
- Re: pruning projects @ ws Nirmal Mukhi
- Re: pruning projects @ ws Jeremy Boynes
- Re: pruning projects @ ws Aleksander Slominski
- Re: pruning projects @ ws Nirmal Mukhi
- RE: pruning projects @ ws Campana Jr., Salvatore J
- Re: pruning projects @ ws Davanum Srinivas
