Hi eialbur, The [email protected] mailing list has few subscribers, and is mostly focused on administrative and cross-platform issues.
I recommend you repost to [email protected]. More info here: <http://lucene.apache.org/java/docs/mailinglists.html#Java%20Developer%20List> Steve > -----Original Message----- > From: eialbur [mailto:[email protected]] > Sent: Wednesday, July 20, 2011 3:53 PM > To: [email protected] > Subject: Did Neo4j really add XA transactions to Lucene > > I am interested in Neo4j (as well as Lucene). I have seen a number of > postings asking for XA transaction support from Lucene. Neo4j contends > that > they are completely ACID XA transaction compliant, including their use of > Lucene for text indexing. > > Is this correct? Do you know if they got Lucene to fully support the > transactions (e.g. would work if I pulled the plug at an inopportune > moment), or are they just sort-of transactional. > > If they are fully transactional, will Lucene take advantage of the Neo4j > open source and provide transactions for everyone (Neo4j volunteered for > you > to copy their source). I would LOVE to use Lucene for the full text > indexing in my mysql database!! > > I have misgivings about all of this and would greatly appreciate someone > with a greater understanding than I have stepping up and explaining to me > what's going on here. > > Thanks > > -- > View this message in context: http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Did- > Neo4j-really-add-XA-transactions-to-Lucene-tp3186471p3186471.html > Sent from the Lucene - General mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
