http://people.apache.org/~hossman/#threadhijack
On Mon, Nov 8, 2010 at 12:22 PM, marcus clemens <[email protected]> wrote: > > hi > > i am looking for a java lucene solr contrator to work in west sussex . the > contract will last a year and its paying around £ 400 a day > > is this of interest to anyone . if so please send me a cv > > kind regards > >> Date: Mon, 8 Nov 2010 11:50:46 -0500 >> Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Lucene Java -> Lucene Core >> From: [email protected] >> To: [email protected] >> >> +1 >> >> >> >> On Mon, Nov 8, 2010 at 10:57 AM, Grant Ingersoll <[email protected]> wrote: >> > Hi Luceneers, esp. PMC and Committers, >> > >> > I'm in the process of reviewing our branding per the Trademarks committee >> > sending out requirements. So, expect to see some changes to the website >> > and logos in the coming days as well as, potentially, a request for help. >> > >> > Per the Branding Requirements at >> > http://www.apache.org/foundation/marks/pmcs, I think we should stop >> > calling our core Java implementation Lucene Java, since Java is an Oracle >> > TM, and move to simply calling it Lucene Core or Lucene for Java. >> > >> > I'm inclined to call it Lucene Core or (Core, for short). Most of us just >> > call it Lucene anyway, so the Core part really is only for navigation >> > purposes on the website. >> > >> > I'd like to discuss this for a day or two and then call a vote. >> > >> > Thoughts? >> > >> > -Grant >
