On Thu, Mar 4, 2010 at 2:13 PM, Andi Vajda <[email protected]> wrote: > Indeed. In my case, if the hard synchronisation of releases in both > directions were to become a hard requirement, I would probably vote > -1. > > I'm +1 with making it a requirement that in order to release Solr > we'd have to release Lucene too. > > I am -1 making it a requirement that in order to release Lucene we'd > have to release Solr too.
I think these sort of logistics can be hashed out by the dev community... but it's apparently concerning enough people (that releases are "synchronized").... so I'll call a new vote making this change explicit (ie, that Lucene can release w/o Solr). Mike
