I also feel like this vote is too broad. E.g. I'm ok with merging
dev-lists and committers, but unhappy about aligning releases. What
points exactly are we voting here on?
Michael
On 3/3/10 3:54 PM, Mark Miller wrote:
See the linked to discussion. (I know its pretty long)
I think Mike covered the broad strokes here:
http://search.lucidimagination.com/search/document/477615025eaa0e9d/factor_out_a_standalone_shared_analysis_package_for_nutch_solr_lucene
Though I'm sure its open to tuning. I think the discussion gives the
gist of what the pro mergers want though (though many responders
appeared to be confused as to what most of us think the merge means,
so who knows)
- Mark
On 03/03/2010 06:48 PM, Bill Au wrote:
What does merging development mean? I think we probably should be more
specific since that can mean different things to different folks. We
should
be all voting on the same thing.
Bill
On Wed, Mar 3, 2010 at 5:42 PM, Yonik Seeley<[email protected]> wrote:
Many Lucene/Solr committers think that merging development would be a
benefit to both projects.
Separate downloads would remain (among other things), so end users
would not be impacted (except for higher quality products over time).
Since this is a change to Lucene/Solr project development, I'd like to
get a format vote from the committers of both projects.
If there are 3 +1s and more +1s than -1s, we can pass this to the
Lucene PMC to ratify.
-Yonik
Discussion thread:
http://search.lucidimagination.com/search/document/c7817932400808ad/factor_out_a_standalone_shared_analysis_package_for_nutch_solr_lucene
