All of this needs to be discussed and it's not even clear whether any of it is required. Lucene runs pretty smoothly from a PMC level, so I don't feel a huge need to break something up just for the sake of it.
At any rate, I doubt it makes much sense for some subs to be split out, but Mahout has already decided to do it (after the 0.3 release comes out) -Grant On Mar 1, 2010, at 7:04 AM, Mattmann, Chris A (388J) wrote: > Hey Grant, > > I¹d like to explore this < does this imply that the Lucene sub-projects will > go away and Lucene will turn into Lucene-java and maintain its Apache TLP, > and then you¹d have say, solr.apache.org, tika.apache.org, mahout.apache.org > (already started), etc. etc.? If so, that may be the best of all worlds, > allowing project independence, but also not following the Apache > "antipattern" as Doug put it... > > Cheers, > Chris > > > > On 3/1/10 7:28 AM, "Grant Ingersoll" <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Also, as Doug alluded to, the Board is likely to ask us to consider less >> subprojects in the future, so we may be consolidating and spinning off >> anyway. > > > ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > Chris Mattmann, Ph.D. > Senior Computer Scientist > NASA Jet Propulsion Laboratory Pasadena, CA 91109 USA > Office: 171-266B, Mailstop: 171-246 > Email: [email protected] > Phone: +1 (818) 354-8810 > ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > Adjunct Assistant Professor, Computer Science Department > University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 90089 USA > ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > >
