On Sun, Jul 24, 2011 at 1:08 PM, Henri Yandell
<[email protected]> wrote:
> On Sun, Jul 24, 2011 at 5:08 AM, Rony G. Flatscher
> <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>> On 23.07.2011 20:47, sebb wrote:
>>>> * BSF: Slow activity; only coder in last two years is Sebb.
>>>>
>>>> A difficult one to decide on. I think we should challenge on it going
>>>> to the Attic, and if not send it to Commons where it will have more
>>>> chance of activity.
>>>>
>>> Now that JSR-223 is part of Java 1.6 there is less need for BSF.
>>> There are no bugs oustanding against BSF 3.x.
>>> Not sure it is worth fixing any of the 2.x bugs.
>>>
>> Please wait a little bit. It has been a long time intent to fix the few
>> bugs in 2.x and add the enhancements in JIRA to it. Maybe also creating
>> a JSR-223 bridge to allow BSF 2.x engines to be used in JSR-223
>> environments (not sure whether this is worthwhile, but it may be the
>> case that there are 2.x engines for which no JSR-223 engines
>> exist).(Just have not been able to push this more to the front of my
>> table; have a 2.x engine in use that has the bugfixes incorporated and I
>> would like to apply them to the official 2.x.
>
> Fair enough request.
>
> Still leaves the question of what to do with BSF. Do we:
>
> * Leave all of Jakarta open just for BSF.
> * Move BSF elsewhere. Where? Commons?
> * Move to the Attic.
>
<snip/>

I don't think Jakarta should/will exist for much longer, so first
bullet isn't an option. Or, put differently, if that is the preferred
option, then we should rather get a BSF TLP.

-Rahul


> ---
>
> How realistic are we talking on the changes? Your last BSF code commit
> was in 2007. I know I'm being pushy - but I also know how hard it is
> to say "Game Over". If we move it to the Attic, it can always move out
> with the only pain being that you have to do the work locally at
> first, or fork into a Lab/Commons Sandbox/Incubator project.
>
> Hen
>

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]

Reply via email to